Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Myers v. Richardson et al
as 9:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Toaisa Richardson and Larry Cracchiolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Wyoming County Jail
as 6:2023cv06491
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Richardson
Defendant:
Wyoming County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv10537
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams and Alexander Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, Security Captain Ganies, C.O. K. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barcliff et al v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv09762
Plaintiff:
Jackie Barcliff, Isaiah Charles, Jonathan Contreras and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ingram et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06576
Plaintiff:
Roddrick Ingram, Gerson Castro, Edwin Ortiz and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Cynthia Brann, John and Jane Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Miller
as 1:2022cv06606
Petitioner:
James Richardson
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
