Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Clements v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
James Clements
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
John K Williams
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arredondo v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Sergio Arredondo
Respondent:
H. Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mascarenos v. Rio Arriba County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mascarenos
Defendant:
Rio Arriba County Jail, James LNU and FNU Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavazos v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
Roy G Cavazos
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garnica v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Garnica
Defendant:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maldonado v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Frankie Maldonado
Defendant:
FNU Rios and FNU Pascal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oakleaf v. Montes et al
as 2:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Julie Marie Oakleaf
Defendant:
FNU Montes and FNU Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero v. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00753
Petitioner:
Jerry Lucero
Respondent:
FNU Rios and New Mexico Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Donnell Travis Cox
Defendant:
Hector Rios and Attorney General of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
