Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pamm v. Huffman et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pamm
Defendant:
Brad Huffman, John Doe 1, Unknown Shelby and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Morgan et al
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Robinson, MS Department of Corrections, Warden W. K. Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis, Sr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. King et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Warden W. K. Banks, Superintendent Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pamm v. Williams et al
as 5:2018cv00124
Defendant:
C/O Unknown Nick, C/O Unknown Crilder and C/O Unknown Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oatis v. Forrest County Regional Sheriff Department
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Oatis
Defendant:
Forrest County Regional Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Price
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Pamela Robinson and Marylen Sturdivant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raiford v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Raiford
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, County of Forrest, Mississippi, Betty Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Jackson et al
as 4:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Edwards
Defendant:
Dorothy Jackson, Lekethia Williams and Trainee Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spires v. USA
as 3:2014cv00680
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Spires
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Little et al
as 3:2014cv00540
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Brown
Defendant:
Ollie Little, Unknown Edwards, Unknown Trailer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
