Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vazquez-Diaz v. Borreiro et al
as 1:2022cv08708
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant:
Borreiro, Lance, Lucheese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06149
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City of Correction Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toilver v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2015cv00749
Plaintiff:
Samuel RasheenRay mond Toilver
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, County of Erie, Oliver C. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillan v. Farsile et al
as 1:2014cv02036
Plaintiff:
Herman McMillan
Defendant:
Farsile, Loretta A. Preska, Charles Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Shiro et al
as 1:2013cv06849
Plaintiff:
Leviticus Mitchell
Defendant:
Mora Shiro, Cuin, Steven Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. N.Y.P.D. 42nd Pct. et al
as 1:2012cv06127
Plaintiff:
Robert Fleming
Defendant:
N.Y.P.D. 42nd Pct., Kindler, Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05129
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora B. Schriro, Michael Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Corrections Officer Truedo et al
as 9:2011cv00627
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Truedo and Corrections Officer Haze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Corrections Officer Truedo et al
as 1:2011cv00393
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Truedo and Corrections Officer Haze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y. et al
as 1:2010cv08805
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y., One Police Plaza, Eliot Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
