Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bentley v. McCarthy
as 6:2021cv06038
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Bentley
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Wolcott
as 6:2020cv06882
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Wolcott
as 6:2020cv06369
Respondent:
Superintendent Wolcott
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Walcott
as 1:2019cv09337
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas
Respondent:
Walcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2016cv02205
Defendant:
Superintendent Harold Graham, John Does 1 through 10, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 9:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
Harold Graham, David Walters and Robert Thomas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2016cv00869
Defendant:
Superintendent Harold Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and Correctional Officer David Walters
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 9:2015cv01303
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
H. Graham, Walter, New York Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2015cv06205
Defendant:
Superintendent H. Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson, New York Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Graham et al
as 9:2015cv00398
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
H. Graham, Correction Officer 1-10 and Robert Thomas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
