Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Wallace v. Koehnlein et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Trayshaun Wallace
Defendant:
Roger Koehnlein and Brandon Schulz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01682
Petitioner:
Patrick D Rogers
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Dennis Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Curiel v. Marik
as 1:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Roger Curiel
Defendant:
Peter Marik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staszak, Marcin v. Schliesman, Michael et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Marcin Staszak
Defendant:
Deputy Michael Schliesman, Deputy Jessica Rodenkirch, Deputy Katherine Kregman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis-Rogers v. Wussow et al
as 2:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Akiel Davis-Rogers
Defendant:
Joel Wussow, Randall Hepp and Yana Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis-Rogers v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Akiel Davis-Rogers
Defendant:
John Doe and Jamall Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Bricco
as 2:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Quentin Lee Rogers
Defendant:
Captain Patrick Bricco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vidal v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2022cv01378
Petitioner:
Dennis Vidal
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin, Child Protection Services, Brenda Lee Barthoimew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hettinger, Roger v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Roger Hettinger
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rogers v. Webster et al
as 2:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rogers
Defendant:
Nevin Webster, Brett Helmer, Brian Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
