Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Rose v. Ashcraft et al
as 3:2024cv03033
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Nancy Ashcraft, Jamie Kirkhan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penton v. Gregory et al
as 4:2023cv04228
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Ashley Gregory, Erin Posey, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Ashcraft et al
as 3:2023cv03801
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Nancy Ashcraft, Jamie Kirkhan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Anderton et al
as 3:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Khorey J. Anderton, Lieutenant McBride, Kay Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estrada v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv03338
Petitioner:
Amber Rose Estrada
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Melinda Eddy
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estrada v. Macoupin County Jail
as 3:2023cv03336
Plaintiff:
Amber Rose Estrada
Defendant:
Macoupin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayfield v. Loos et al
as 3:2023cv01642
Plaintiff:
Calvin Mayfield
Defendant:
Rose Loos, Cathy McClure, Oakley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Light et al
as 3:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Denise Light, Monica Sheets, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Derenell Hill and Rose Hill
Defendant:
John Idleburg, C. Clouse, C. Crockett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
