Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Mary Ann Jones, Charlis Dukes, Ruth Saucier and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Howard v. Saucier et al
as 5:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Dwight Antonio Howard
Defendant:
Ruth Saucier and James Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrothers v. Perkins et al
as 5:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrothers
Defendant:
Erikize Perkins, Mary Groom, Victoria Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hearron v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Ron King, Brenda Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hinds County Detention Center et al
as 3:2008cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamar Thomas
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Center, Mary Ann Rushing, Bobby Funches and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Outley v. Watt et al
as 3:2008cv00415
Plaintiff:
Eddie Meyer Outley
Defendant:
Ruth Watt and Hinds County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2008cv00315
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Barnell Brown
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Malcom McMillan, Ruth Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Curtis v. McMillan, et al
as 3:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
Terry Jerome Curtis
Defendant:
Malcom McMillan, Ruth Wyatt and Jane Doe Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2007cv00546
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Fox
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Malcom McMillin, Ruth Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonson v. Ishee, et al
as 2:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kenny F. Edmonson
Defendant:
Matt Ishee, Larry Dykes, Jones County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
