Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Benter v. Rufu et al
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
S. Rufu, Sgt. Drechsel and Corporal Pestel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuh et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh and Adam S. Hamilton
Defendant:
Governor Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prasad v. Henson et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Krishil S. Prasad
Respondent:
John D. Henson, Dustin B. Kouba, Amanda S. Rockers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Cass County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv00160
Defendant:
S. Hirchert, Anders, Jantior Brain and others
Plaintiff:
Ardell Levert Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erickson v. Cass County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Kevin Erickson
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott Thompson
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Attorney General of North Dakota, North Dakota State Crime Laboratory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walck v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lee Walck
Defendant:
Leann K. Bertsch, Warden Schmalenberger, Elizabeth Sundberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. US Probation Officer et al
as 1:2015cv00097
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
US Probation Officer, Daniel Hovland and U S Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Grd Frk's Correction Center
as 2:2014cv00107
Petitioner:
Roger Jackson
Respondent:
Grd Frk's Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. G.F.C.C.C medical Dept, Program's etc. et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerome Jackson
Defendant:
G.F.C.C.C medical Dept, Program's etc., slow court's system, Grand Fork's City of Correction Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
