Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jeffrey Jordan v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13260
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY S. JORDAN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
(PC) Gray v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Gray
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant Warden, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Nassau County Jail
as 3:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
John S. Jordan
Defendant:
Nassau County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Duval County Jail
as 3:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
John S. Jordan
Defendant:
Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Nassau County Jail
as 3:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
John S. Jordan
Defendant:
Nassau County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Ford v. J. Morales et al
as 2:2022cv07782
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ford
Defendant:
J. Morales, S. Jordan, Sgt Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendall Shaka Broughton v. B. Chavarria et al
as 2:2022cv05530
Plaintiff:
Kendell Shaka Broughton
Defendant:
B. Chavarria, R. Flores-Borunda, J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv01195
Petitioner:
Jeffrey S. Jordan
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROOKS v. PHILLIPS
as 3:2020cv05350
Plaintiff:
ADOLPHUS T ROOKS
Defendant:
PHILLIPS, JANE DOE, P SHIFFLELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Castillon, et al v. CCA
as 17-35896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR CASTILLON, DUSTY KNIGHT, JUSTIN KEITH PETERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
