Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Billy Birdwell, II v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY PAUL BIRDWELL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, N. GRANNIS, R. SUBIA and others
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2011cv00201
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Ben Bernanke, Joseph Biden and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Perales v. U. S. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2010cv02621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U. S. Internal Revenue Service, U. S. Department of Labor, Hilda L. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Azael Dythian Perales et al v. Dollar Tree Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01772
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Alice M Batchelder, Ben S Bernanke and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Steve Edwards and Azael Dythian Perales
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv02388
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mayfield v. Cates et al
as 2:2010cv01062
Plaintiff:
Michael Mayfield
Defendant:
M. Cates, N. Grannis, R. Subia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rackley v. Cates et al
as 2:2010cv01065
Defendant:
M. Cates, N. Grannis, R. Subia and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Rackley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lefavour v. Cates et al
as 2:2010cv01063
Defendant:
M. Cates, N. Grannis, R. Subia and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lefavour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairwell v. Cates et al
as 2:2010cv01064
Defendant:
M. Cates, N. Grannis, R. Subia and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Fairwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
