Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hamilton et al v. Ross Correctional Inst. et al
as 2:2022cv01872
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hamilton, Estate of Nicholas Davis, Marcus G. Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Ross Correctional Inst., Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Scott A. Ahart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Sexton et al
as 2:2021cv01921
Defendant:
Brabson, Lt. Shane Sexton and Cook
Plaintiff:
Terron Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lane v. Cooper et al
as 2:2019cv04592
Defendant:
Captain Sexton, C/O Knight, Ross Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Beavers et al
as 2:2019cv01793
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lane
Defendant:
C/O Beavers, Lieutenant Sexton and C/O Farmer
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sexton v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 2:2018cv00424
Petitioner:
Jason S. Sexton
Defendant:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whiteside v. Thalheimer, et al.
as 2:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Norman V. Whiteside
Defendant:
Trayce Thalheimer, Cynthia Mausser, Kathleen Kovach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteside v. Thalheimer, et al.
as 1:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
Norman V. Whiteside
Defendant:
Trayce Thalheimer, Cynthia Mausser, Kathleen Kovach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Winters et al
as 2:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Keimarkus O. Woodard
Defendant:
Mr. Winters, J. Evans, Hunter Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sexton v. Warden Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2014cv00445
Petitioner:
Johnathan Sexton
Respondent:
Warden Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
