Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McMillan (ID 111775) v. Alexander et al
as 5:2022cv03278
Plaintiff:
Pettix McMillan
Defendant:
Byron Alexander, James Skidmore, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley (ID 52926) v. Skidmore et al
as 5:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
Martin Arnold Riley
Defendant:
(fnu) Skidmore, (fnu) Hopkins, (fnu) East and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullendore (ID 104410) v. Cheeks et al
as 5:2022cv03160
Plaintiff:
Randall Kent Mullendore
Defendant:
Chandler Cheeks, Shannon Meyer, (fnu) Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Skidmore
as 5:2022cv03055
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
(fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Skidmore
as 5:2022cv03046
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
(fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wheeler (ID 45041) v. Skidmore et al
as 5:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Wheeler
Defendant:
James C. Skidmore, (fnu) Godson and Godson Bustrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo (ID 110683) v. Skidmore
as 5:2022cv03041
Petitioner:
Jose Carrillo
Respondent:
(fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Centurion
as 5:2022cv03026
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Thomas
Defendant:
Centurion and (fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales (ID 110872) v. Wray et al
as 5:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Gonzales, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Wray, Millie Murray and James Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith (ID 23865) v. Cline et al
as 5:2018cv03022
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Cline, Colette Winkelbauer, James Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
