Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Marignay v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv05013
Plaintiff:
Jaymon Marignay
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail, Clayton County Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
James Willie Murry
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail Administration, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Hill et al
as 4:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
James Willie Murry
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail Administration, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Person v. Victor Hill, Clayton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv02572
Plaintiff:
Edward Jamar Person
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Hill, Administration, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laidler v. Sharp et al
as 6:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Laidler
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Sharp, Lt. FNU Shoemaker, Sgt. FNU Fugitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce et al v. Waycross Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
Vivian F. Pierce and Curtis Pierce
Defendant:
Waycross Police Department, Judge Gibson, Sgt. Smart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Chatham County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2019cv00244
Petitioner:
Matthew Bryan Smart
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Chatham County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laidler v. Smart et al
as 6:2019cv00076
Defendant:
Officer FNU Cain, FNU Smart, Lt. FNU Shoemaker and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Laidler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Leif
as 4:2019cv00165
Defendant:
Smith Kane Leif
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. United States Of America
as 6:2008cv00010
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Smart
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
