Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Hicks v. Renner et al
as 4:2023cv04121
Plaintiff:
LaPete R. Hicks, Sr.
Defendant:
Justin Renner, Brent Fluke and Alex Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke v. Fluke et al
as 1:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Sioux Falls Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Jon Henri Bryant, Sr.
Defendant:
Sioux Falls Police Department, Tom Ward, John Carda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Craig v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Craig, Sr.
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Grant Flynn and Brent Fluke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shangreaux v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
James Lawrence Shangreaux, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reddy v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05009
Petitioner:
Justin S. Reddy, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chipps v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv05077
Plaintiff:
Austin Lee Chipps, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Iron Crow v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv05065
Plaintiff:
Marlon Dean Iron Crow, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Craig v. Fluke et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Petitioner:
Jerry Lee Craig, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv04068
Plaintiff:
Jon Henri Bryant, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
