Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Stewart v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Heather Stewart
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, David Knight, Nurse Kristy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Wheeler
as 1:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Morgan
Defendant:
Stewart J. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. USA
as 3:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
James Stewart, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wilson v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
Christopher Stewart Wilson
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terry v. Rowan County Jail et al
as 0:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Wes Coldiron and Rowan County Jail
Plaintiff:
James Stewart Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Rowan County Jail et al
as 4:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Jailer Wes Coldiron and Rowan County Jail
Plaintiff:
James Stewart Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartley v. Jenny Stewart Medical Center et al
as 5:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Deputy Jailer Newby, Dr. Matthew Johnson, Christian County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bartley and Christopher Douglas Bartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Fiorito v. Dr. Love et al
as 0:2018cv00099
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Dr. Thomas Love, Dr. Peikar and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. Christian County Jail et al
as 5:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Antonio G. Stewart
Defendant:
Christian County Jail, Adam Wayne Ellison, James Bradley Hageman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Paul Mays
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Webb Strange, Cordant Health Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
