Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Carillo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Victor Carillo
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, C. Santiago and J. Capilupo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitmore v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Whitmore
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, Michael Downey, Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Santiago v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv16142
Plaintiff:
Edwin Santiago, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villa v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv02145
Petitioner:
Santiago Villa
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santiago v. Adkins et al
as 2:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
William Santiago
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Rob Jeffreys, J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Fyance Dawson
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Robert Schultz, Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Matherly et al
as 1:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Fabian Santiago
Defendant:
Martin L Matherly, Jamar A Range, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2022cv00999
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, B. Moton, Jeffery Cheeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Barrios et al
as 1:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Wray, John Doe, Barrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jerry Harvey
Defendant:
E. Williams, Assoc. Warden Cheeks, Assoc. Warden Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
