Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Wilson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Demond Lamont Wilson
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Calvin Abor, FNU Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Saunders et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders, Michael White, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Lubbock Sheriff's Office
as 5:2023cv00159
Petitioner:
Norman Saunders
Respondent:
Lubbock Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Saunders v. Lopez et al
as 5:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
John F. Saunders
Defendant:
SGT. FNU Lopez, SGT. FNU Cruz, CMA Selma LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Cox
as 2:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Jason Saunders
Respondent:
Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McClelland v. Womack et al
as 1:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Chester Joseph McClelland
Defendant:
Jacquely Womack, Frank Saunders, Giden Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duran v. Fisher et al
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jose Duran
Defendant:
LaShawnda Fisher, Jacquelyn Womack, FNU Gooch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00723
Petitioner:
Germaine Saunders
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
