Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Sayres v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tadashi Sayres
Defendant:
State of California, State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. McLean et al
as 4:2020cv01900
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, J. Bal, Maureen McLean and others
Plaintiff:
Latwahn J. McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simental v. Adams et al
as 3:2017cv00801
Plaintiff:
Rudy Simental
Defendant:
N. Adams, M. Sayre, J. Bal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Thomas et al
as 3:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Lewis Dominic Shaw
Defendant:
L. Thomas, B. Fellows, M. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaidez v. Stainer et al
as 3:2016cv06017
Plaintiff:
Roberto Chaidez
Defendant:
M.D. Stainer, Kelly Harrington, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Sayre et al
as 3:2016cv03909
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Michael C. Sayre, Laurie Thomas, Donald Venus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albanez v. Jacobsen et al
as 3:2016cv00424
Plaintiff:
Henry Albanez
Defendant:
D. Jacobsen, S. Risenhoover, A. Dorfman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillippi v. Kelso et al
as 4:2015cv05579
Plaintiff:
Bruce Phillippi
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, J. Bal, Maureen McLean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lafonzo R Turner v. Matthew Cates et al
as 4:2015cv03067
Plaintiff:
Lafonzo R. Turner
Defendant:
Matthews Cates, City and County od Sacramento Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lafonzo R Turner v. Matthew Cates et al
as 2:2015cv00109
Defendant:
Dr Adams, California Correctional Health Care Services, Warden Brenda M. Cash and others
Plaintiff:
Lafonso R Turner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
