Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Bearden v. Walls
as 2:2017cv02020
Petitioner:
Randall Keith Bearden
Respondent:
Scott Walls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office/Jail et al
as 4:2014cv01144
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office/Jail, Scott Walls, D Bankston and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuch v. Walls et al
as 4:2013cv01625
Plaintiff:
John Michael Schuch
Defendant:
Scott Walls, Kimberly, Beth and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Walls et al
as 4:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Victor Shawn Cole
Defendant:
Scott Walls, Dewayne Bankson, Cooper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 4:2013cv00238
Plaintiff:
Grady Allen Sutton
Defendant:
Marshall County Jail, Bankston, Scott Walls and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Walls et al
as 4:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Billy Jack Powell
Defendant:
Scott Walls and Dewayne Bankson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Walls et al
as 4:2012cv03498
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Smith
Defendant:
Scott Walls and Dewayne Bankson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hacker v. Walls et al
as 4:2012cv02982
Petitioner:
Timothy Ray Hacker
Respondent:
Scott Walls and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hacker v. Walls et al
as 4:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Hacker
Defendant:
Scott Walls, Jason Windsor and Marshall County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkland v. Walls et al
as 4:2011cv03902
Petitioner:
Donna Jo Kirkland
Respondent:
Scott Walls and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
