Cases 1 - 10 of 64
PICKETT v. ROSS, et al
as 5:2024cv00229
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER TROUTMAN, SGT ROSS, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERIES and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE PICKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv01460
Petitioner:
Barry Brooks and Adom Brooks
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds, Shannon Wallace and Jeffrey S. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WITHERS
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SMITH, III
Respondent:
WARDEN SHANNON D WITHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shannon v. Unknown
as 4:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gibran Alexander Shannon
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley-Sanders v. Phelps
as 1:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
Leshunta Finley-Sanders
Respondent:
Shannon Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JONES v. MOSLEY et al
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN JONES
Defendant:
SHANNON MOSLEY and PRIYANKA BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEAY et al v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO DEMOND SEAY, GARLAN RICHARDSON, DEMOND BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, CHIEF OSTRANDER, CAPTAIN JEROMMA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03396
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Christopher Lee Bishop, Sylvia Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Baker et al
as 1:2021cv02698
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deshun Harris
Defendant:
Judge Anthony Baker, District Attorney Shannon Wallace and Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
