Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Dwight Shelton v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Dwight Shelton
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McDaniels v. Shirley
as 3:2022cv02043
Petitioner:
Shelton T. McDaniels
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Giannini v. Burton et al
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Louie Giannini
Defendant:
Mr. Robert B. Burton, Mr. Vivero, Mr. M. Coler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louie Giannini v. Robert B. Burton et al
as 2:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
Louie Giannini
Defendant:
Mr. Robert B. Burton, Mr. Vivero, Mr. M. Coler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Shelton v. USDC Northern Alabama
as 2:2021cv02113
Petitioner:
Dwight Rolland Shelton and Dwight Rolland Shelton, Jr
Respondent:
USDC Northern Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. Hill
as 2:2021at01078
Defendant:
Rick Hill
Petitioner:
Dwight Rolland Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Milton et al v. Patterson et al
as 4:2021cv08545
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Shelton Adams, Robert Blackwell and others
Petitioner:
William Pardue
Defendant:
Ronald R. Patterson, State of California, Craig Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Climmons v. Taylor et al
as 3:2021cv01226
Defendant:
Flanngan, Prez, R. Shelton and others
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Climmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wilson v. Shelton et al
as 2:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lamel Jowan Wilson
Defendant:
J. Pickett, T. Thompson, K. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. The BOP Paralegal Specialists & DSCC et al
as 2:2020cv11817
Respondent:
Leeann D Tufte, Alicia Sankey, The BOP Paralegal Specialists & DSCC and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
