Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wood v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv01705
Plaintiff:
Shelton Lamont Wood
Defendant:
R. Shane Weber, Bradley O. Butler, Sgt. Alicia Cartwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv00125
Defendant:
Yes Care, Warden R. Shane Weber, Asst. Warden Bradley O. Buttler and others
Plaintiff:
Shelton Lamont Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv02897
Plaintiff:
Enrico E.M. Brown
Defendant:
Col. Jerome Smith, Prince George's County Department of Corrections, Director Cornne Labbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. USA-2255
as 8:2020cv01433
Petitioner:
Travell Xavier Shelton
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gill v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2014cv02981
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
State of Maryland, State's Attorney Offices, Public Defenders Offices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02834
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Correro-Vasquez v. Shearin et al
as 1:2013cv00996
Plaintiff:
Juan Correro-Vasquez
Defendant:
Bobby D. Shearin , Randy Watson , Robin Woolford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Shelton et al
as 1:2011cv03519
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bishop
Defendant:
Cornell Shelton, Bond Sequore Hosp. and Sunday Nwosu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. USA - 2255
as 1:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Shelton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fletcher v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 1:2010cv02033
Plaintiff:
Warren T. Fletcher
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, Shelton Richardson, Bruce Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
