Cases 1 - 10 of 10
AWAL v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2017cv08486
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMOD AWAL
Defendant:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH, RAVI SOOD, L DIAMATTEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKSTONE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2016cv08600
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. BLACKSTONE
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, ASHLEY STARK, SHERRI LILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07678
Plaintiff:
GERALD C. SHELTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06813
Plaintiff:
SHELTON NEAL, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06216
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO H. SHELTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2015cv04603
Plaintiff:
AARON LEWIS SHELTON, V
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CALDWELL and DONALD J. LOMBARDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2015cv01249
Petitioner:
STEVEN RAY SHELTON
Respondent:
JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHELTON v. MAIN et al
as 2:2014cv01635
Petitioner:
RAYMOND SHELTON
Respondent:
MERIL MAIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and DAVID L. DACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHELTON v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2009cv06521
Petitioner:
MATAN SHELTON
Respondent:
GEORGE HAYMAN and MICHELL RICCI
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
