Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Gomez v. Brown et al
as 3:2023xc00570
Petitioner:
Luis Gomez, Jr
Respondent:
Hayley M Brown, Sherry Shipman and Jacqueline R Habersham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lopez v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Fernando Lopez
Defendant:
Anthony Ramirez, Charles Sperer, James Poland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Ramirez et al
as 6:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Fernando Lopez
Defendant:
Anthony Ramirez, Charles Sperer, James Poland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roland v. Texas State of
as 4:2021cv00817
Petitioner:
Teri Anna Roland
Respondent:
Texas State of
Defendant:
Jamie Masters, Sherry Shipman, Tiffany Haertling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Shipman v. USA
as 4:2021cv01076
Petitioner:
David Kenneth Shipman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shipman v. USA
as 7:2021cv00089
Petitioner:
David Kenneth Shipman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dewbre et al v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv02661
Defendant:
Curtis L. Jordan, John M. Hasting, Jamarcus D. Goodall and others
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Omelas, Servando Duran, Roy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewbre et al v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv02634
Defendant:
Curtis L. Jordan, John M. Hasting, Jody L. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Omelas, Servando Duran, Roy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Collier et al
as 3:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, John Armstrong, Kristenna Shipman and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipman v. Southwest Correctional Medical Group et al
as 7:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Carolyn Holley, Rebecca Hamilton, Southwest Correctional Medical Group and others
Plaintiff:
David Kenneth Shipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
