Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Liles v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Liles
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Medical Department, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Douglas
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Chance Leeds and Latoya Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01248
Petitioner:
Adam Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Simmons, Jr. v. The City of Chester County et al
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Jeffie Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Chester County, Steve Davidson and Seth Preslar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Vantell (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Vantell
as 3:2023mc00008
Petitioner:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Mays et al
as 3:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Jones
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Ernest Lewis, George Firestine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02316
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dexter Q. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Simmons v. Byrd
as 3:2021cv00251
Defendant:
Warden Raymond Byrd
Plaintiff:
James Jaylen Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
