Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harris v. People of the State of California
as 3:2019cv03317
Petitioner:
James LaVell Harris and Smiley James Harris
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of California et al
as 3:2019cv02982
Plaintiff:
James LaVell Harris and Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Hank Comstock, David Pike, Alex Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley Harris v. Robert Howe, et al
as 11-16246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SMILEY JAMES HARRIS, AKA James Lavell Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HOWE, K. C. GRISBY, A. STOTTSBERRY and others
Harris v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Rodney Mitchell and Vincent Monreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Lake County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv05214
Plaintiff:
Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Vincent Monreal, Oliver Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2009cv04470
Plaintiff:
Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Rodney Mitchell, Vincent Mondeal, John Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Lake County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv03758
Plaintiff:
Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Rodney Mitchell, James Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of California
as 3:2009cv03257
Petitioner:
Smiley James Harris
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Lake County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv03168
Plaintiff:
Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Mitchell R. Howe, K. C. Grisby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Harris v. State of California
as 3:2009cv02829
Petitioner:
Smiley James Harris
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
