Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Spaulding v. Dillman
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: Kwame Dalas Spaulding
Defendant: S. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Lush et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff: Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant: Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaulding v. Core Civic et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00062
Defendant: Officer John Doe, Deputy Warden Webb, Warden Laughlin and others
Plaintiff: DeWayne Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPAULDING v. HARDY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2017cv00172
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE SPAULDING
Defendant: JAMES E HARDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPAULDING v. TAYLOR
as 5:2015cv00463
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE SPAULDING
Defendant: CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spaulding v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00107
Petitioner: Asha K. Spaulding
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SPAULDING v. TAYLOR
as 7:2015cv00093
Petitioner: DEWAYNE SPAULDING
Respondent: CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPAULDING v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
as 7:2015cv00092
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE SPAULDING
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPAULDING v. LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 7:2015cv00091
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE SPAULDING
Defendant: LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, JAMES E. HARDY and SARA L CROW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPAULDING v. TAYLOR
as 5:2015cv00084
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE SPAULDING
Defendant: CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?