Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Coker v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Spencer Lee Coker
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calton v. Wilder et al
as 4:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Allen F Calton
Defendant:
Thomas Wilder, Spencer Johnson and Bryan Gardne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Lucas et al
as 6:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Colton Jacob Gentry
Defendant:
Warden Spencer R. Lucas and Sgt. Wendall J. Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaffney v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Paul Sean Gaffney
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, April Zamora, Eric Pichardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braggs v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lynn Braggs and Lynn Bragg
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denby v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Deldrick Simmons
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Reno P. Roberts
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munn v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lester Munn
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
William Garrison
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
