Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Baldwin v. Stancil
as 24-1139
Petitioner:
GARY L. BALDWIN
Respondent:
MOSES STANCIL, C.D.O.C. Executive Director
Berckmann (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01528
Plaintiff:
Jon Berckmann
Defendant:
Stancil, Colorado Supreme Court, Jeff Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Chad Jones
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Jessica Krueger, Jeremiah Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Albert Garza
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Brekke and Rasor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Budd (PS) v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Petitioner:
James Michael Budd
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich, Andre Stancil and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
