Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. NYS BOP Chairman et al
as 1:2023cv04854
Plaintiff:
Leroy Peoples
Defendant:
NYS BOP Chairman, Tina M. Stanford and D. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Leroy Peoples
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Tina Stanford and John Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chung v. Board of Parole et al
as 9:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Chung
Defendant:
Board of Parole and Tina Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malawich v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv08412
Petitioner:
David Malawich
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci, Tina M. Stanford, Ronald Hotaling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. State Of New York et al
as 9:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
John Curry
Defendant:
State of New York, Rodney Young, Ms. Charvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albritton v. Fredella et al
as 9:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Jemal Albritton
Defendant:
Lawrence Fredella, Tina M. Stanford, Tyece Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00881
Petitioner:
Lowell J. Britt
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci, Marco Ricci, Tina Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britt v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Lowell J. Britt
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Marco Ricci and Tina M. Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staine v. Hochul et al
as 9:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Eric Staine
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Anthony Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
