Cases 1 - 10 of 238
(PC) Sharp v. Board of Supervisors (Fresno), et al.
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Andre Sharp
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors (Fresno), Cliff Allenby, Stephen Mayberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams v. Stephen Mayberg
as 17-17300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN MAYBERG
Cason Cunningham v. Norm Kramer, et al
as 17-15430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASON D. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
NORM KRAMER, Ex-Director of Coalinga State Hospital
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA AHLIN, Ex-Director of Coalinga State Hospital, AUDREY KING, Ex-Director of Coalinga State Hospital, STEPHEN MAYBERG, Ex-Director of California Department of State Hospitals and others
Deno Eugene Woodis v. John D. Morales et al
as 2:2016cv04508
Defendant:
Clifford Allen, Clifford Allen, Carmen Carbesso and others
Plaintiff:
Deno Eugene Woodis
Woodis v. Atascadero et al
as 3:2016cv00717
Plaintiff:
Deno E. Woodis
Defendant:
Atascadero, J. D. Morales, Stephen Mayberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Kramer et al
as 1:2015cv01868
Plaintiff:
Jesse Sanchez
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronje v. Kramer, et al.
as 1:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
Edward Ronje
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kramer, et al.
as 1:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
Herman Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallworth v. Kramer et al
as 1:2015cv01690
Plaintiff:
Levell Stallworth
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Kramer et al
as 1:2015cv01609
Plaintiff:
David Allen
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
