Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Swanson v. Boyd
as 3:2021cv00383
Petitioner:
Nathan L Swanson, Jr
Respondent:
Bert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swanson v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv01035
Petitioner:
Dontae Swanson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Huddleston v. Wilson County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2015cv00839
Plaintiff:
Robert Huddleston
Defendant:
Wilson County Sheriff Dept., Tennessee Corrections Institute, Swanson Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Department of Probation et al
as 1:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Department of Probation, Jamie Staggs, Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Department of Probation et al
as 1:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Martin
Defendant:
Department of Probation, Jamie Staggs and Angela Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. SCCC et al
as 2:2013cv02429
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Harris
Defendant:
SCCC, Tony B. Williams, Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caery v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Caery
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Minus Adams, Karen Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Swanson et al
as 2:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Guyoka D. Bonner
Defendant:
Debra Swanson and Shelby County Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2012cv02292
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby County Dept. of Corr., Ollie Watts, Loggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv02871
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby County Dept. of Corr., Correct Care Solutions, Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
