Cases 1 - 10 of 18
(PC) Tellez v. Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tellez
Defendant:
K. Hixon, E. Cisneros and M. Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Bloomfield et al
as 3:2022cv05105
Plaintiff:
Vincent Robert Mackey
Defendant:
Robert Bloomfield, Sgt. Baker, Lt. Teixiera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Tafoya v. Holbrook
as 1:2022cv00932
Petitioner:
Fidel Tafoya
Respondent:
David Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen v. Warden
as 5:2021cv01593
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen and Tafoya
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Gogol v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2020cv01397
Defendant:
R. Cavazos, J. Attschuler, M. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Gogol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen v. Riverside Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2020cv00957
Defendant:
Riverside Sheriffs Office and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen and Robert Michael Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Michael Garcia, Abigail Dillon, Bonnie Dumanis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen v. Elisseth Barerra Ramirez et al
as 5:2019cv00489
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Vanleevwen, Tafoya and Robert Michael Vanleeuwen
Defendant:
Elisseth Barerra Ramirez, Christian Vaughan and County of Riverside, California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Michael Vanleevwen v. Elisseth Barerra Ramirez
as 5:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Vanleevwen and Tafoya
Defendant:
Elisseth Borerra Ramirez, Christian Vaughan and County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fear v. Melton et al
as 3:2014cv05473
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Fear
Defendant:
CDCR Employees, Hilliard, Tafoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
