Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BAKER v. MAGISTRATE COURT OF TALBOT COUNTY et al
as 4:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE COURT OF TALBOT COUNTY, SUPERIOR COURT OF TALBOT COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. TERRY et al
as 4:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR, GABRIELLE ALLIAHA BAKER, DANIELLE LEE BAKER and others
Defendant:
TERRY, BOBBY PETERS, Sheriff J J JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYLES v. TALBOT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK
as 4:2018cv00196
Plaintiff:
COREY DEON LYLES
Defendant:
TALBOT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOLLAR v. TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 4:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RICHIE DOLLAR, JR
Defendant:
TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOLLAR v. GATES et al
as 4:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RICHIE DOLLAR, JR
Defendant:
BOBBY GATES, SR. and TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbot v. Widmer
as 1:2016cv04525
Plaintiff:
Robert Talbot
Defendant:
G. Widmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOLLAR v. TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 4:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
THOMAS RICHIE DOLLAR, JR
Respondent:
TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DOLLAR v. TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 4:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RICHIE DOLLAR, JR
Defendant:
TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YANCEY v. TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2014cv00254
Plaintiff:
JAMES HAYWARD YANCEY
Defendant:
TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GUY GRIMSLEY and BOBBY GATES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Waldrop et al
as 3:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dexter Germaine Lewis
Defendant:
Paul Waldrop, Glen Talbot and Jason Whitman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
