Cases 1 - 10 of 701
Callicotte v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jason Colby Callicotte
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ebersole et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dylan Eugene Taylor
Defendant:
Miranda B. Ebersole and FNU Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01754
Petitioner:
Robert Cor'Darius Taylor
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe, Gray County Jail, Gracie Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Jasmine Garcia, Jonathon J. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 7:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
John H. Taylor
Defendant:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director, Kevin Smith, Kareem Hayekco IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Franklin Taylor
Defendant:
Jeff Neal and Turn Key Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Mikey Ray Taylor, Jr. and Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
