Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Carr v. BOP
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Carr
Defendant:
BOP, C.E.O FMC Fort Worth, Heriberto H. Tellez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kozitzki v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center
as 5:2021cv00239
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Texas Board of Pardons & Parole General Counsel, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Kozitzki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Gauna
as 2:2020cv00293
Defendant:
J Gauna and TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Parker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00940
Defendant:
Mrs. FNU Kich, Goel Ramirez Gandarilla, Alvaro Mejia and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Balli Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01065
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Flores v. Teboe et al
as 2:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Erbey Flores
Defendant:
Tim Teboe, Sharon C Williams and UTMB Hospital Galveston
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mauldin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00563
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden, Regional Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mauldin v. Warden FCI-Low Beaumont et al
as 1:2013cv00503
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Warden FCI-Low Beaumont, Bureau of Prisons, General Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vasquez v. Livingston et al
as 2:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Vasquez
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Davis, Adam R. Gonzalez and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roppolo v. Thaler
as 2:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roppolo
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
