Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff: Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant: Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff: Demetrius J. Thomas
Defendant: Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff: Thomas Rogers
Defendant: Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff: Thomas Knight
Defendant: Semple and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wojcik v. Saas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff: Thomas Joesph Wojcik
Defendant: Robert Saas, Adam Leonetti, Israel Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff: Thomas Edmund Harrison
Defendant: Department of Corrections and Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff: Kevin A. Thomas
Defendant: Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff: Tyrick Thomas
Defendant: Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01681
Plaintiff: Tyrick Thomas
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connerton v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01657
Petitioner: Thomas J. Connerton
Respondent: United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?