Cases 1 - 10 of 2,233
Plattenburg v. Stiles Unit et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Quinton Plattenburg
Respondent:
Stiles Unit and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Harris County Medical United
as 4:2024cv02266
Plaintiff:
Wendell Thomas
Defendant:
Harris County Medical United
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Sugar Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Director Bryan Collier, Senior Warden Adrian A. Amonett, Assistant Warden Candice Hannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Director Bryan Collier, Senior Warden Adrain A. Amonett, Assistant Warden Candice Hannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Abbott et al
as 5:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Mag. Judge John W. Primomo, Judge H. F. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00615
Petitioner:
Gerald Wilson Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plattenburg v. Stiles Unit et al
as 4:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Quinton Plattenburg
Defendant:
Stiles Unit and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Gerald Wilson Thomas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
