Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BROWN v. LANGSTAFF et al
as 1:2020cv00093
Defendant:
US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS, ADRIENNE D NASH and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON DESHAUN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. LANGSTAFF
as 7:2020cv00032
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARLIN v. LEONARD et al
as 1:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARLIN
Defendant:
GREGORY J LEONARD, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF, HUGH LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Burnside et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant:
BURNSIDE, Medical Boad of Atlanta Georgia, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Burnside et al
as 4:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Allen Alphonzo Adams
Defendant:
Burnside, Medical Boad of Atlanta Georgia, Thomas Q. Langstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen Adams v. Robert Henderson, et al
as 12-15625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HENDERSON, County Commissioner, JUNE BISHOP, ASSISTANT WARDEN, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, US MAGISTRATE JUDGE and others
ADAMS v. HENDERSON et al
as 5:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant:
ROBERT HENDERSON, JULIE BISHOP, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. FIELDS et al
as 5:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
RAMACHANDRA R PAIDI, CHARLES PANNELL, JR, CHARLES A MOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Pannell et al
as 1:2011cv04021
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Charles A. Pannell, Jr., E. Clayton Scofield, III, B. Avant Edenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2011cv02828
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
B. Avant Edenfield, C. R. Smith., Marc T. Treadwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
