Cases 1 - 10 of 15
THORPE v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2020cv00408
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER J. THORPE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thorpe v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Highlands County)
as 2:2020cv14005
Plaintiff:
Clarence G. Thorpe, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thorpe v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Highlands County)
as 8:2020cv00005
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Clarence G. Thorpe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ACEVEDO v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2019cv00262
Defendant:
T THOMAS and T THORPE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACEVEDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Israel et al
as 0:2018cv61465
Plaintiff:
Alvin Bell
Defendant:
Sheriff Israel, Broward County Medical Staff, Broward County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sagesse v. Bastedo et al
as 2:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rones Sagesse
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Bastedo, Joseph M. Clark, Gregory Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurston v. Thorpe
as 1:2017cv23613
Plaintiff:
Giaquinto Thurston
Defendant:
Rose Thorpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Archer et al
as 6:2016cv01590
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lovell Thorpe
Defendant:
Phil Archer, State Attorney Office and Palm Bay Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01388
Petitioner:
Mark Adam Thorpe
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Thorpe et al
as 0:2015cv61807
Plaintiff:
Eric Mitchell
Defendant:
A. Thorpe and Scott Israel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
