Cases 1 - 10 of 41
EL et al v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
NOBLE CHRISTO EL, TRE N VISCO, LEONARD LUDWIGSEN, JR and others
Defendant:
DAVID KELSEY (in his individual and official capacity) doing business as DAVID KELSEY, WARDEN, K. BROWN, "JOHN" CHARLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. KUHN et al
as 2:2022cv02781
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ROBERT E. CARTER, ASST. SUPT. ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LOATMAN et al
as 1:2019cv19174
Defendant:
MOORE, OFFICER LOCAMOCO, HOSKINSON and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY R. JOHNSON and HARVEY R. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. OFFICER T. BROWN et al
as 1:2018cv16213
Defendant:
E. FLETCHER, OFFICER T. BROWN, LIEUTENANT TUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN T. BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv09183
Petitioner:
ESAIAS J. TUCKER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TUCKER v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07163
Plaintiff:
ALISHA TUCKER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07166
Plaintiff:
EDWIN TUCKER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv06808
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CORNELIUS TUCKER
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BAYSIDE PRISON, JOHN POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. CHRISTIE
as 2:2015cv06337
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TUCKER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv04433
Petitioner:
MATTHEW TUCKER
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JENNIFER VALEZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
