Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Harris v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Edward Harris
Defendant:
Jacob C. Johnson, William Rosso and Tammy Jack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. Crain et al
as 2:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
Johnny D. Crain, Jr. and Tammy Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Crain et al
as 2:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes and Jason Jarrell Hughes
Defendant:
Johnny D. Crain, Jr. and Tammy Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Linder
as 2:2022cv00587
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes and Jason Jarrell Hughes
Defendant:
John Linder
Consolidated Defendant:
Randy Seals, Johnny D. Crain, Jr., Tammy Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Crain et al
as 2:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
Johnny D. Crain, Jr. and Tammy Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Furlow v. USA
as 3:2022cv00158
Petitioner:
Tammy Cole Furlow
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vallejo v. Whittington et al
as 5:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Vallejo, Tammy Lynn Vallejo and Thomas Hernandez
Defendant:
Jullian Whittington and Captain Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warner v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Michael Jack, Tammy Hendrickson and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoyt v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00865
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hoyt
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Michael Jack, Tammy Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonnier v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00851
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Tammy Hendrickson, Darryl Vannoy and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Sonnier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
