Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Ewing v. Back et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Steven Guy Ewing
Defendant:
J. Back and Tammy W. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jay Harrison and Gregory Harrison
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Tammy Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgley v. Currie
as 4:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ridgley
Defendant:
Tammy Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Dallas RRM
as 3:2023cv01501
Petitioner:
Tammie L Little
Respondent:
Dallas RRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Crawford v. USA
as 3:2023cv00777
Petitioner:
Tammy Louise Crawford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Adams v. Shelby et al
as 4:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Tammy Shelby, Michael Carvajal, Mike Piasiensk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchette v. Ward et al
as 7:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Blair A. Blanchette
Defendant:
Ingrid Ward, Francis Grace, Tammy Nauit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owolabi v. TDCJ Allred Unit
as 7:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Monsour G. Owolabi
Defendant:
TDCJ Allred Unit, Tammy Shelby, Eric Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silas v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00692
Petitioner:
Tammy Renee Silas
Respondent:
FNU Smith and Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Woodson v. Brannan, et al
as 5:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Marcus D Woodson
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Defendant:
Kaylee Brannan, Angela Montemayor, Lubbock County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
