Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Fourstar et al v Trump et al
as 2:2019cv01899
Defendant:
Unknown Officials of Designation and Sentence Computation Center (Grand Prairie, Texas), Connie Tonini, Israel Jacquez and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Bruce John Denny, David Allen McQueen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cress v. Snohomish County Superior Court et al
as 2:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Ted L Cress
Defendant:
Snohomish County Superior Court, Snohomish County Public Defender Association, Snohomish County Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Suslova et al
as 2:2015cv00162
Defendant:
Suslova, Dr Olga Suslova, Dr Tanya Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Williams and James Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holcomb v. Burnett et al
as 3:2014cv05087
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Holcomb
Defendant:
Charles Burnett, Jennifer Minkler, Grays Harbor County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Renton Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01172
Petitioner:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Respondent:
Renton Police Department, Michael Walker, Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jensen v. Washington State Deptarment of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv01380
Plaintiff:
Ted Jensen
Defendant:
Washington State Deptarment of Corrections, Cindy Kline and Brian Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winslow v. Feather et al
as 2:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Ted L Winslow
Defendant:
Marion Feather, M. Aslam and Federal Detention Center Seatac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell v. Administrative Subdivision et al
as 3:2007cv05568
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Cantrell
Defendant:
Administrative Subdivision, State of Washington, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
