Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clervrain v. Way, et al.
as 2:2020cv00540
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Demetrices Mitchell
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department, Detective McManus, Detective Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mora v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv02140
Petitioner:
Phillip H. Mora
Respondent:
Dwayne Estes, Marion County Florida Judicial Circuit Court, State of Florida Porbation and Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01779
Petitioner:
Rohn O Hayes
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes, Alachua County Florida and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Luther Strange, The Attorney General of the State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2011cv03941
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward White
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2011cv00518
Plaintiff:
Edward Ridley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Luther Strange and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ridley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
Edward Ridley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Luther Strange, The Attorney General of the State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Esco v. State of Florida (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00583
Plaintiff:
Billy Dwight Esco
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
