Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
GRAY v. BUSH et al
as 4:2020cv00171
Defendant:
SONNY PERDUE, SAM NUNN, PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH and others
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springer v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv02076
Defendant:
FBOP, Warden, United States Penitentiary, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lopez-Ortega v. Johns et al
as 2:2016cv00154
Petitioner:
Lope A. Lopez-Ortega
Respondent:
Tracy Johns, Bureau of Prisons, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morris v. Flounoy et al
as 2:2016cv00126
Petitioner:
Darvin Morris
Respondent:
Vick Flounoy, Federal Bureau of Prison and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Taylor
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Howard Z. Simms, Samuel S. Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
as 1:2015cv02101
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2013cv01000
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Theodore Jackson, Fulton County Pretrial Service, Overton Thierry and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
