Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Demos v. Fortune 500, et al.
as 26-5147
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
FORTUNE 500, TIM COOK, CEO, Apple Corporation, ELON MUSK and others
Demos v. Fortune 500, et al.
as 26-5119
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
FORTUNE 500, TIM COOK, CEO Apple Corporation, ELON MUSK and others
Demos et al v. The Fortune 500 et al
as 2:2026cv02062
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr and Tim Cook
Defendant:
The Fortune 500, Elon Musk and Jeff Besos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. The Fortune 500 et al
as 2:2026cv02009
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
The Fortune 500, Tim Cook, Elon Musk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Cook, et al.
as 26-1816
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
TIM COOK, CEO Apple Inc, BRIAN MOYNIHAN, CEO Bank of America, AT&T INC., CEO John Stankey and others
Demos v. Cook et al
as 2:2026cv00252
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Tim Cook, Brian Moynihan, AT&T Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2025cv00326
Petitioner:
Tim Cook
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2025cv00229
Petitioner:
Tim Cook
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. Rex Tillerson, et al
as 22-35626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
REX W. TILLERSON, CEO of Exxon Mobil Corporation, TIM COOK, CEO of Apple, Inc. and WARREN E. BUFFETT, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
John Demos, Jr. v. Rex Tillerson, et al
as 22-35519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
REX W. TILLERSON, CEO, Exxon Mobil corporation, TIM COOK, CEO, Apple Inc. and WARREN E. BUFFETT, CEO, Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
