Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hewlett v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2018cv01243
Petitioner:
William Hewlett
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. Bolster et al
as 1:2018cv00601
Petitioner:
Morris J Warren
Respondent:
Mark Bolster, J. Ray Ormond and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HUGHES v. BOLSTER et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Petitioner:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Respondent:
J. Ray Ormond and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NIXON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv00046
Petitioner:
Troy Nixon
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMS v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2014cv00046
Petitioner:
Kristopher Sims
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, United States Marshal's Service, Federal Bureau of Prison's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turnage v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2014cv00052
Petitioner:
Tony Turnage
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. The United States Parole Commission
as 1:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Defendant:
The United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Baker v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2011cv00316
Petitioner:
Anthony Baker
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mooney v. U.S. Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00613
Petitioner:
Fredrick Mooney
Respondent:
U.S. Department Of Justice and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young-Bey v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2008cv01172
Petitioner:
John R. Young-Bey
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
