Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MCCOY v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv04308
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOY
Defendant:
USA, USA BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fontenot v. USA
as 1:2022cv05163
Plaintiff:
Leonard Fontenot
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
FLY v. UNITED STATES et al.
as 1:2020cv13962
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AZOUKI v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv12468
Petitioner:
Charbel Azouki
Respondent:
Attorney General USA William Barr, Kevin McAleenan, WILLIAM BARR and others
Defendant:
Matthew Albence and William Anderson
Robinson v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv09415
Plaintiff:
William Ulyssess Robinson
Defendant:
USA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SITTERLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, USA et al
as 3:2014cv04717
Petitioner:
NANCY B. SITTERLE
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, USA, PAMELA BONDI and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shepherd v. PALMER et al
as 1:2014cv02992
Plaintiff:
Arthur E Shepherd
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, PALMER, MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 1:2014cv01411
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glenn Anderson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAXTON v. LENHARDT et al
as 1:2013cv04357
Plaintiff:
SHAWN BRAXTON
Defendant:
MELISSA LENHARDT, THOMAS REHILL and T-MOBILE USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
